Transform that "I'll write tests later" into comprehensive test suites right now. Generate professional-quality unit tests with intelligent mocking, edge case coverage, and framework-specific patterns that actually help catch bugs.
Quick Start
Jump straight in and watch as comprehensive test suites appear in seconds:
Generate comprehensive unit tests for this React component at C:/project/src/UserProfile.jsx
Create Jest tests for this Node.js service at C:/api/UserService.js with database mocking
Generate PyTest tests with fixtures for C:/src/calculator.py focusing on edge cases
TDD Ready
Perfect for Test-Driven Development - generate your tests first, then write the implementation to make them pass. It's like having a senior developer pair with you on testing strategy.
What It Does
Think of this as your personal testing expert who never gets tired of writing thorough test suites. generate_unit_tests
creates comprehensive test suites with framework-specific patterns and intelligent coverage that goes far beyond basic "happy path" testing.
Here's what makes it special:
- Intelligent Coverage Analysis - Understands your code structure and generates tests for all public methods, edge cases, and error conditions
- Sophisticated Mocking - Creates realistic mocks for external dependencies, databases, APIs, and complex integrations
- Framework Expertise - Knows the best patterns for Jest, PyTest, PHPUnit, Mocha, and more
- Edge Case Detection - Spots boundary conditions, null handling, and error scenarios you might miss
- Production-Ready Quality - Tests that actually help prevent bugs, not just increase coverage numbers
The generated tests follow AAA patterns (Arrange, Act, Assert), include proper setup and teardown, and provide clear, descriptive test names that serve as living documentation of your code's expected behaviour.
Parameters
Customise your test generation to match your project's needs and testing philosophy:
Parameter | Type | Required | Default | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
filePath |
string | Yes* | - |
Path to the file you want to test Example:
"C:/src/services/PaymentService.ts" |
code |
string | Yes* | - |
Code content directly (alternative to filePath) Perfect for pasting functions you want to test
|
testFramework |
string | No | "jest" |
Testing framework: "jest", "mocha", "pytest", "phpunit", "vitest" Automatically uses framework-specific patterns
|
coverageTarget |
string | No | "comprehensive" |
Coverage level: "basic", "comprehensive", "edge-cases" Higher levels include more boundary conditions
|
context |
object | No | {} |
Framework context and testing patterns Example:
{"async": true, "database": "PostgreSQL", "framework": "Express"} |
projectPath |
string | No | - |
Project root for multi-file test generation Enables cross-file dependency understanding
|
language |
string | No | "javascript" |
Programming language (auto-detected from file extension) Supports JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, PHP, and more
|
*Either filePath or code is required - choose whichever fits your workflow
Real-World Examples
Here's how to generate tests for different scenarios:
React Component with Hooks
houtini-lm:generate_unit_tests with:
- filePath: "C:/project/src/components/UserProfile.tsx"
- testFramework: "jest"
- coverageTarget: "comprehensive"
- context: {
"framework": "React",
"hooks": true,
"testing_library": true,
"typescript": true
}
Node.js API with Database
houtini-lm:generate_unit_tests with:
- filePath: "C:/api/services/UserService.js"
- testFramework: "jest"
- coverageTarget: "comprehensive"
- context: {
"async": true,
"database": "PostgreSQL",
"framework": "Express",
"mocking": "database_operations"
}
Python Class with Complex Logic
houtini-lm:generate_unit_tests with:
- filePath: "C:/src/models/DataProcessor.py"
- testFramework: "pytest"
- coverageTarget: "edge-cases"
- context: {
"pandas": true,
"large_datasets": true,
"fixtures": true
}
WordPress Plugin Function
houtini-lm:generate_unit_tests with:
- filePath: "C:/wp-plugin/includes/ContactFormHandler.php"
- testFramework: "phpunit"
- coverageTarget: "comprehensive"
- context: {
"wordpress": true,
"hooks": true,
"database": "WordPress",
"security": true
}
Utility Functions (Edge Case Focus)
houtini-lm:generate_unit_tests with:
- code: "function calculateDiscount(price, percentage) { return price * (1 - percentage / 100); }"
- testFramework: "jest"
- coverageTarget: "edge-cases"
- context: {"focus": "boundary_conditions", "validation": true}
What You Get Back
You'll receive production-ready test suites that go far beyond basic coverage:
🎯 Complete Test Files
- Comprehensive test suites covering all public methods and functionality
- Proper file structure with clear organisation and imports
- Setup and teardown methods for clean test isolation
- Descriptive test names that clearly indicate what's being tested
🔍 Edge Case Testing
- Boundary condition tests - minimum/maximum values, empty inputs
- Null and undefined handling - proper defensive programming tests
- Invalid input scenarios - malformed data, wrong types
- Error condition testing - network failures, timeouts, exceptions
🎭 Sophisticated Mock Setup
- External dependency mocking - APIs, databases, third-party services
- Function spies and stubs for behaviour verification
- Realistic test data that mirrors production scenarios
- Mock cleanup to prevent test interference
🏗️ Framework-Specific Patterns
- Jest: describe/it blocks, beforeEach/afterEach, custom matchers
- PyTest: Fixture-based dependency injection, parametrised tests
- PHPUnit: TestCase classes, data providers, mock objects
- React Testing Library: User-centric testing patterns
📊 Testing Best Practices
- AAA Pattern - Arrange, Act, Assert structure for clarity
- Test isolation - Each test can run independently
- Clear assertions - Specific, meaningful test expectations
- Performance considerations - Tests for critical performance scenarios
Quality Focus
These aren't just "coverage tests" - they're designed to actually catch bugs and regressions. Each test has a clear purpose and tests realistic scenarios your code will encounter in production.
Framework-Specific Features
Each framework gets specialised treatment based on its unique patterns and best practices:
🟨 JavaScript/TypeScript (Jest/Vitest)
- Modern async testing - Proper handling of Promises and async/await
- Module mocking - jest.mock() patterns for dependencies
- Custom matchers - Framework-specific assertions
- Snapshot testing where appropriate for component output
⚛️ React Components
- React Testing Library patterns - User-centric testing approach
- Hook testing - Custom hooks with proper act() wrapping
- Event simulation - Click, input, and interaction testing
- Context provider mocking - Clean context setup for tests
🐍 Python (PyTest)
- Fixture-based setup - Reusable test dependencies
- Parametrised tests - Multiple test scenarios with one function
- Mock and patch decorators - Clean mocking patterns
- Pytest marks - Test categorisation and filtering
🐘 PHP (PHPUnit)
- TestCase inheritance - Proper PHPUnit class structure
- Data providers - Parametrised testing with datasets
- Mock builders - PHPUnit's mock object patterns
- Setup and teardown - Database and state management
🌐 Node.js APIs
- Supertest integration - HTTP endpoint testing
- Database mocking - Clean database test patterns
- Middleware testing - Express middleware isolation
- Error handling tests - Proper error boundary testing
Perfect Use Cases
Here's when this function becomes absolutely invaluable:
🚀 Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Generate comprehensive test suites before writing implementation code. The tests serve as your specification and guide your development process, ensuring you build exactly what's needed.
🏥 Legacy Code Safety Net
Inherited some mysterious code that needs modification? Generate tests first to understand its behaviour, then make changes confidently knowing you'll catch any regressions.
⚡ Rapid Development Cycles
When deadline pressure makes you want to skip testing, this generates comprehensive suites in seconds. No more "I'll add tests later" - they're done now.
🎓 Learning Testing Patterns
Study the generated tests to learn framework-specific patterns, mocking strategies, and edge case identification. It's like having a testing mentor.
🔒 Critical Function Protection
For payment processing, authentication, or security functions, generate comprehensive tests that cover every possible edge case and error condition.
📋 Code Review Preparation
Generate tests before submitting code for review. Reviewers love seeing thorough tests, and you'll catch issues before they do.
🔄 Refactoring Confidence
Before refactoring complex code, generate comprehensive tests to ensure your changes don't break existing functionality. Refactor fearlessly with a robust safety net.
Best Practices
Get the most value from your generated test suites:
📝 Provide Rich Context
The more context you provide, the better the tests:
- Mention your framework and version (React 18, Node.js 20, Laravel 10)
- Include database or external service dependencies
- Note async patterns or performance requirements
- Specify testing philosophy (unit vs integration focus)
🎯 Choose the Right Coverage Level
- "basic" - Quick test coverage for simple functions
- "comprehensive" - Production-ready testing (recommended default)
- "edge-cases" - Exhaustive testing for critical functions
🔧 Framework-Specific Tips
- React: Always mention if you're using hooks, context, or Redux
- Node.js: Specify database type and whether you need Supertest
- Python: Mention if you need fixtures for complex setup
- PHP: Include WordPress context for plugin/theme testing
⚡ Workflow Integration
Make testing part of your development rhythm:
- Generate tests alongside new features (parallel development)
- Use TDD approach - tests first, then implementation
- Add tests before refactoring existing code
- Review and customise generated tests for your specific needs
🎨 Customisation Strategy
Use generated tests as your foundation:
- Review test names and adjust for clarity
- Add project-specific test cases
- Modify mock data to reflect real scenarios
- Add performance tests for critical paths
Review Before Running
Always review generated tests before running them. While they're designed to be production-ready, you may want to adjust test data, add project-specific scenarios, or modify assertions to match your exact requirements.
Troubleshooting
Hit a snag? Here are solutions to common testing generation issues:
Generated tests are too basic or generic
The tests aren't covering enough scenarios or lack framework-specific patterns.
- Increase
coverageTarget
to "comprehensive" or "edge-cases" - Add detailed context about your framework and patterns
- Specify your exact testing library (React Testing Library, Supertest, etc.)
- Mention specific scenarios you want covered (async, database, errors)
- Use a larger model (13B+ parameters) in LM Studio for better quality
Tests won't run or have syntax errors
Generated tests have syntax issues or missing imports.
- Ensure you specified the correct
testFramework
- Include your exact language/framework versions in context
- Check that your project has the testing framework installed
- Review imports - you may need to adjust paths for your project structure
- Verify the
language
parameter matches your file type
Mocks aren't working correctly
Generated mocks don't match your dependencies or fail to mock properly.
- Specify exact dependency names in context:
{"database": "PostgreSQL", "orm": "Sequelize"}
- Mention specific libraries that need mocking (axios, fs, database clients)
- Include your project structure context for proper import paths
- Review mock implementations and adjust for your specific API signatures
- Add
"mocking": "detailed"
to context for more sophisticated mocks
Missing edge cases or error scenarios
Tests don't cover important boundary conditions or error handling.
- Use
coverageTarget: "edge-cases"
for exhaustive testing - Add context about critical scenarios:
{"focus": "error_handling", "boundary_conditions": true}
- Mention specific edge cases relevant to your domain
- Include information about expected error types and handling
- Specify if you need performance or security-related tests
React component tests missing user interactions
Generated React tests don't cover user events or component behaviour properly.
- Specify
"testing_library": true
in context for user-centric tests - Mention specific interactions:
{"interactions": ["click", "input", "form_submit"]}
- Include information about component props and state
- Specify if component uses context, hooks, or Redux
- Add
"user_events": true
for comprehensive interaction testing
Tests are too slow or inefficient
Generated test suites take too long to run or use inefficient patterns.
- Add
"performance": "optimized"
to context - Specify if you need
beforeEach
vsbeforeAll
setup patterns - Mention if you prefer unit tests over integration tests
- Include database setup preferences (in-memory vs mocked)
- Review and optimise mock implementations for your use case